Ground Handling

Ground Handling Regulations and Standards:
Ensuring Compliance and Safety

Introduction

Ground handling involves a complex web of activities performed by various companies at airports worldwide. To maintain high levels of safety, efficiency, and fairness in this industry, a framework of regulations and standards has been developed. This framework spans from global guidelines set by organizations like ICAO and IATA, to national and regional laws, and down to company-level operating procedures.

In this article, we discuss the regulatory landscape for ground handling and the key standards that govern it – including the push for global harmonization, the role of programs like ISAGO and IGOM, and how compliance is enforced. Understanding these regulations and standards is crucial for ground service providers and airlines alike to ensure safe and consistent operations at every airport.

The Evolving Regulatory Landscape

Historically, ground handling was less regulated on a global scale compared to other aviation domains (like flight operations or aircraft maintenance). Regulation often occurred at the national or airport level – for example, countries required ground handlers to be licensed and follow certain safety rules, and airports set their own standards and audit their handlers.

However, this led to a patchwork of different requirements. A ground handling company operating in multiple countries had to navigate varying training mandates, equipment standards, and oversight regimes. The lack of uniform international standards meant inconsistent service quality and sometimes safety gaps.

Recognizing this, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) took steps to strengthen regulation of ground handling. In 2014, ICAO formed a Ground Handling Task Force to examine the issue. The task force found a “gap in the regulatory Standards for ground handling activities at a global level” – existing ICAO provisions in Annexes (such as Annex 6 on Operations, Annex 14 on Aerodromes, Annex 19 on Safety Management) did not adequately cover ground handling services.

Essentially, ground handlers were not uniformly required under international law to implement Safety Management Systems or meet standardized training and operational practices, unlike airlines or certified maintenance organizations.

As a first step, ICAO published the Manual on Ground Handling (Doc 10121) in 2019. This manual provides guidance to states, airport operators, and ground service providers on best practices and how to implement effective safety and quality control in ground handling. It covers topics like safety management, operational procedures, and even coordination mechanisms between airlines, ground handlers, and aerodrome authorities. While not legally binding, it represents “accepted industry best practice” that states can adopt or reference.

Importantly, ICAO has been working towards incorporating ground handling into its Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs). A new chapter on ground handling is being considered for inclusion in the PANS (Procedures for Air Navigation Services) Aerodromes (Doc 9981), which would provide principles and procedures for managing ground handling services at aerodromes.

Additionally, ICAO is looking at developing new provisions (potentially an Annex or expanding existing Annexes) to require certain safety oversight of ground handling by member states. Though these processes take time, the direction is clear: international regulators want to ensure ground handling meets consistent safety and security standards worldwide.

States are being encouraged to review and strengthen their oversight of ground handling services under their jurisdiction, to harmonize with this global approach (a recommendation made at ICAO’s 2021 High-Level Conference on COVID-19, which touched on ground ops regulation). In parallel, the European Union has been evaluating ground handling safety regulation.

The EU liberalized ground handling markets in the 1990s (Directive 96/67/EC opened airport handling to competition), but safety oversight remained with member states and airports. In recent years, EASA (European Union Aviation Safety Agency) has developed rules requiring European ground handling providers to implement safety management and adhere to certain procedures, bringing them under a more standardized regulatory framework.

This is part of the EU’s broader initiative to enhance ground safety after incidents – effectively moving towards requiring ground handlers to have something akin to an approval or certification focusing on safety competence (similar to how airlines and maintenance orgs are approved).

Industry Standards: IGOM and ISAGO

Even before formal regulations tightened, the industry recognized the need for self-regulation through standards. Two of the most important global standards in ground handling are IATA’s IGOM (International Ground Operations Manual) and ISAGO (Safety Audit for Ground Operations) program.

IGOM is essentially a standardized procedures manual for ground handling. IATA developed IGOM to harmonize ground handling processes worldwide, providing “one way” to do things that all airlines and handlers can adopt. It covers procedures for passenger handling, baggage handling, ramp and aircraft handling, cargo handling, etc.

For example, IGOM specifies standard marshaling signals, how to connect ground power, how to perform loading checks, etc. If an airline and its ground handler both follow IGOM, there should be minimal confusion or need for airline-specific training – which enhances safety and efficiency.

The use of IGOM has been growing. IATA has a compliance program where ground handling companies can declare conformity with IGOM standards. Many airlines have incorporated IGOM into their ground handling manuals or require their handlers to adhere to it. Implementing IGOM leads to world wide operational consistency, as noted by IATA.

In 2022, IATA launched an IGOM Portal to help identify gaps between different companies’ procedures and the IGOM standard; by early 2024, over 160 airlines and 80 ground handlers were participating, and 111 gap analyses had been published to align procedures. This shows a significant global effort to move toward the global standardization of processes in ground handling.

ISAGO is a complementary program: it is an audit scheme that accredits ground handling companies for meeting a set of safety and operational standards. Essentially, ISAGO does for ground handlers what IOSA (IATA Operational Safety Audit) does for airlines. An ISAGO audit reviews a ground handler’s organization and management system, training, policies, and procedures on everything from aircraft handling to cargo to security. Companies that pass the audit are registered as ISAGO-certified.

ISAGO has gained wide traction since its introduction in 2008. By 2023, IATA reported conducting 303 ISAGO audits in that year, an 18% increase over the previous year. The ISAGO registry included 210 ground handling service providers across 365 stations (airports) in 221 airports worldwide. Furthermore, 153 airlines were using ISAGO audit reports as part of their risk management when outsourcing ground operations. This means many airlines will prefer or even exclusively contract ground handlers that are ISAGO-registered, trusting that they meet global safety standards.

Regulators also see ISAGO’s value – nearly 40 regulators and airports worldwide endorse ISAGO and cooperate with IATA, using ISAGO audits to complement their own oversight of handlers. Some civil aviation authorities accept ISAGO certification as meeting their requirements or even make ISAGO a prerequisite for licensing at major airports. For example, Turkey’s DGCA and several airports in the Middle East have worked closely with ISAGO and sometimes integrate it into local approval processes.

The combined effect of IGOM and ISAGO is a robust industry-driven standards regime. IGOM provides the “what and how” of safe operations, and ISAGO provides the assessment and verification that handlers are following those practices and have proper management systems in place. According to an IATA press release, increased participation in these programs “bodes well for safety and efficiency, aiming to reduce risk, avoid ground damage, and enable standardized, sustainable operations.”.

From a compliance perspective: A ground handling company that aligns its manuals with IGOM and passes ISAGO audits is likely to meet or exceed most regulatory requirements as well. In a sense, adhering to these standards prepares a company for regulatory compliance because they encapsulate best practices that regulators want to see. It’s not surprising that many ground handlers have adopted internal mottoes like “Follow IGOM and aim for ISAGO” as part of their quality and safety goals.

National and Airport-Level Regulations

At the national level, ground handling regulation can vary. Commonly, countries require ground service providers to be certified or licensed by the aviation authority or airport authority. This typically entails demonstrating adequate training programs, safety management, insurance coverage, and sometimes financial fitness (given the importance of service continuity).

For example, in India, ground handling agencies must be approved by the civil aviation authority and follow a National Civil Aviation Security Program which includes staff background checks and training.

Airports themselves often impose rules via ground handling licenses or contracts. These can include minimum service standards, equipment requirements, and safety provisions. Airports conduct audits and can penalize or even bar handlers who don’t meet standards.

For instance, an airport may require all handlers to abide by its ramp safety rules (like specific speed limits, FOD control programs, etc.) and have inspectors monitoring compliance.

Safety Management Systems (SMS) are increasingly a requirement. ICAO Annex 19 (Safety Management) obliges member states to mandate SMS for certain aviation service providers. While ground handlers were not originally among the required entities (Annex 19 primarily covered airlines, airports, ATC, maintenance orgs), the push now is to include them. Some countries have proactively extended SMS requirements to ground handling companies.

This means a ground handler must have a formal hazard reporting system, risk assessment processes, safety performance monitoring, and continuous improvement – which are audited by the regulator..

In Europe, EASA is moving ground handling under its regulatory scope with new rules (under development) that would standardize safety requirements for ground handlers EU-wide. This is somewhat analogous to how airline operations are standardized under EASA rules. The forthcoming regulations likely will require ground handling providers to implement SMS, adhere to certain training and operational practices (many of which mirror IGOM), and be under the oversight of national authorities or possibly EASA itself. For ground handlers, this will formalize what may have been voluntary before.

Another national aspect is security regulations. Ground handlers must comply with aviation security rules (e.g., background checks for staff with access to aircraft, training in security awareness). Many countries treat ground handlers as “regulated agents” in the cargo security supply chain or give them responsibilities under the national civil aviation security program (for instance, catering truck drivers must secure aircraft doors after service, etc.). Compliance with security regulations is usually enforced via airport authorities and national inspections.

Labor and safety regulationsalso come into play – for instance, occupational health laws requiring proper training for driving or lifting, or labor laws dictating working hours. While not aviation-specific, compliance with these effects ground operations (e.g., limitations on split shifts could affect crew scheduling).

Airport slot and access rules may indirectly regulate handling – e.g., an airport might limit the number of ground handlers (for efficiency or space reasons) and license only handlers that meet set criteria. The EU Directive ensures at large airports there’s competition (at least two handlers per category), but even then, airports run tender processes and select handlers based on quality and compliance proposals.

To manage all these, ground handling companies maintain robust compliance departments. They produce operations manuals that integrate regulatory requirements, often structured to also meet ISAGO/IGOM. They ensure staff certifications are up to date (e.g., dangerous goods certificate renewals, airport driving permits, etc.).

They also undergo regular audits: internal audits, airline audits (airlines audit their contracted handlers), airport audits, and regulatory inspections

Compliance and Enforcement

Ensuring compliance with ground handling regulations and standards is a shared responsibility:

Ground Handling Companies themselves must enforce procedures internally. Many larger handlers have quality assurance managers at each station who conduct routine audits of operations (for example, checking if ramp staff perform aircraft walk-around checks as required, or if equipment maintenance logs are up to date).

They run safety committees that review incidents and ensure corrective actions are implemented. Compliance is often built into performance evaluations; stations are rewarded for passing audits or penalized for findings.

Airlines that hire ground handlers also play a role. Airlines are ultimately responsible for the safety of their operations, so they carefully vet ground service providers. This can include requiring proof of training, conducting station audits, and even stationing airline personnel (ground safety officers or “station managers”) to monitor ramp operations.

If a handler falls short – say an airline audit finds improper loading procedures – the airline will demand corrective action, and extreme cases can result in contract termination or requiring a change in key handling personnel. The trend of airlines relying on ISAGO registration simplifies this vetting: trusting an independent audit rather than doing their own each time.

Airport Authorities monitor day-to-day compliance on the ramp. They often have ramp safety units that ensure all handlers and airlines follow airport rules (like driving rules, proper use of airport infrastructure). They might issue penalties for things like unsafe driving or FOD mishandling.

Additionally, airports usually coordinate ramp safety meetings with all handlers and airlines to discuss incidents and improvement actions. Many airports also require reporting of any ground collisions or damages, and they keep statistics that feed into safety improvement initiatives.

Civil Aviation Authorities (CAAs) or other regulators enforce national regulations. They may conduct periodic inspections or audits of ground handling companies. For example, a CAA inspector might visit a ground handler to check training records, observe an aircraft turnaround for compliance, or verify that the company’s SMS is functioning (checking how they investigate incidents, etc.).

If non-compliances are found, regulators can issue findings that the handler must address, and in severe cases could suspend or revoke a ground handling license. However, it’s worth noting that regulatory oversight intensity historically varied – some states were hands-on, others delegated a lot to airports. With ICAO’s renewed focus, more CAAs are ramping up oversight of handlers.

Third-Party Audits and Certification Bodies: Apart from ISAGO (which is run by IATA), there are other audit schemes like the Airport Services Association’s (ASA) audit program, or ISO certifications (some ground handlers get ISO 9001 for quality management, ISO 14001 for environmental management, etc.). While not regulatory, these contribute to compliance culture.

For example, a ground handler with ISO 45001 (occupational health and safety) will have robust safety procedures that help meet legal occupational safety requirements too.

Enforcement also comes via contractual obligations. Ground handling contracts with airlines often stipulate compliance with all laws and industry standards, effectively binding the handler to, say, follow IGOM and maintain ISAGO registration. Failure can lead to financial penalties (like damage cost liabilities) or loss of business.

Another development is the inclusion of ground handling in state safety programs and occurrence reporting systems. ICAO encourages states to gather data on ground handling incidents. In some countries, ground incidents (like aircraft ground damage or injures on ramp) must be reported to the aviation authority, similar to flight incidents.

This allows analysis and safety actions. Over time, this may lead to more targeted rules if certain risks are highlighted (for instance, if many incidents involve miscommunication during pushback, regulators might mandate dual-language proficiency or standardized phraseology training for headset operators, etc.).

Global Harmonization and Future Outlook

The long-term trend is toward harmonization – aligning ground handling regulations and standards globally to ensure a uniformly high level of safety and service. In a future scenario, we may see:

Ground Handling Organizations Certification: Much like airlines need an Air Operator Certificate (AOC), ground handling companies might require a formal certificate from authorities to operate, subject to periodic renewal and oversight. EASA’s moves suggest something of this nature in Europe. This would formalize the status of handlers as accountable entities in the safety chain.

Inclusion in ICAO Audits: ICAO’s Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP) could expand to evaluate how states oversee ground handling (currently it focuses on areas like operations, airworthiness, airports). If ground handling becomes a distinct audit area, states will be motivated to have stronger systems in place to score well, which drives compliance internationally.

Stronger Integration of ISAGO with Regulation: We might see more regulators formally adopting ISAGO or similar as a requirement. For example, a regulator could say: any ground handler operating at our international airports must either be ISAGO registered or meet equivalent national audit standards. This would mainstream ISAGO as quasi-mandatory and avoid duplication of audits by different airlines, etc.

One Worldwide Manual: IGOM’s vision is essentially that one standard manual could be used globally. If regulators incorporate IGOM principles into their advisory or regulatory material (and some have started to do so), it could become the de facto rulebook. Already, the European Safety regulators have used IGOM as a reference in developing EASA rules, to not reinvent the wheel but rather codify existing best practices.

Emerging Areas of Regulation: New ground handling aspects may require rules – for example, safe integration of autonomous GSE on aprons, or cyber-security for increasingly digital ground operations. Regulators and standards bodies will likely address these as they arise (e.g., ensuring automated vehicles have fail-safes equivalent to human safety measures, etc.).

In all of this, the voice of the ground handling industry is crucial to make regulations practical. Industry groups like ASA, IATA Ground Handling Council, and regional handler associations work closely with regulators to ensure rules are effective without being unduly burdensome. The collaborative approach seen in developing IGOM and ISAGO – bringing in expertise from airlines, handlers, airports – will continue to be important as regulations evolve.

For ground handling professionals, compliance with this myriads of standards might seem daunting, but it fundamentally boils down to the same core elements: train your people well, follow established safe procedures, manage and report hazards, and continuously improve. The regulations and standards are simply frameworks to ensure those things happen consistently and are verifiable.

When ground handlers everywhere operate under robust standards and oversight, the result is enhanced safety for passengers, crew, and workers, as well as more reliable and efficient airline operations. A well-regulated ground handling environment means an aircraft will receive the same high-quality handling whether it’s in Nairobi, New York, or Narita – and that is a win for the entire aviation system.

References

1. ICAO. “Global Initiative to Strengthen the Regulation of Ground Handling – Working Paper.” ICAO High-Level Conference on Safety, 2021. Notes that ground handling was historically not subject to harmonized global regulations and that ICAO identified a gap in existing SARPs. Describes the establishment of a Ground Handling Task Force in 2014 and the publication of the Ground Handling Manual in 2019 as guidance.

2. ICAO. “Manual on Ground Handling (Doc 10121). ”2019. Provides globally recognized guidance on best practices for ground handling safety and operations. Encourages implementation of an appropriate Safety Management System (SMS) by ground service providers and integration with aerodrome and airline SMS. (Guidance material, not mandatory but used by states to improve oversight).

3. IATA. “IGOM (International Ground Operations Manual).” IATA Publications, Latest Edition. A standardized procedures manual for ground handling covering passenger, ramp, baggage, and cargo procedures. Widely adopted by airlines and handlers to ensure consistency. IATA reports that increased adoption of IGOM is driving greater standardization of ground handling processes worldwide

4. IATA. “ISAGO Fact Sheet 2024.” IATA Safety Audit for Ground Operations. States that in 2023 a total of 303 ISAGO audits were conducted (18% more than previous year), with 210 ground handling providers registered across 365 stations. Notes that 153 airlines use ISAGO reports in their risk management and nearly 40 regulators/airports endorse ISAGO in their oversight programs

5.European Commission. “Council Directive 96/67/EC on Access to Ground handling at Community Airports.” 1996. Liberalized ground handling services in the EU, requiring at least two competing handling providers at major airports. While focused on market access, it allows airports to enforce safety, security, and environmental standards on handlers via approval procedures.

6. EASA. “Notice of Proposed Amendment – Ground Handling.” 2020. Proposes EU-wide rules for ground handling service providers, including requiring implementation of a Safety Management System and compliance with certain training and operational requirements aligned with ICAO and industry standards. Aims to enhance ground safety uniformly across member states.

7. UK CAA. “CAP 642: Airside Safety Management.” Guidance for UK aerodromes on managing ground handling safety (addresses training, vehicle operation, communications, etc.). Often used as a reference by airport authorities to set license conditions for ground handlers operating on the apron.

8.U.S. FAA. “14 CFR Part 139 and Advisory Circulars – Airport Ground Handling.” In the US, while ground handlers themselves are not certified by FAA, airports under Part 139 must ensure safe ground operations. FAA advisory material (e.g., AC 150/5210-20) gives guidance on ground vehicle operations, training, and safety management on ramps, which airports enforce on handling agents through their rules.

9. SKYbrary. “Ground Handling Safety and Oversight.” 2022. Discusses how some states integrate ground handling in their State Safety Program and safety oversight, including mandatory occurrence reporting for ground incidents and adoption of industry standards like ISAGO as part of oversight. Mentions the trend towards requiring ground handlers to have an SMS akin to airlines..

10. IBAC. “IS-BAH (International Standard for Business Aircraft Handling). ”International Business Aviation Council, 2018. Explains that IS-BAH is a voluntary global industry code of best practices for FBOs and business aviation ground handlers, built around an SMS. It helps handlers meet ICAO SMS requirements and is an example of how industry standards preempt regulatory requirements by introducing SMS concepts into ground handling (Shows even private sector ground handling has formal standards akin to ISAGO for commercial sector).

Introduction

Email | info@aatech.aero

SIN | +65-6451-4300

LAO | +856-30-942-9667

SIN Office: 10B Jalan Grisek Singapore 419943

LAO Office: Dongnasok Village, Sikhottabong District, Vientiane Perfecture, Vientiane Capital