Blockchain is essentially a secure, decentralized digital ledger that records transactions or data across multiple computers. Its key features – immutability, transparency, and removal of a single central authority – make it attractive for industries like aviation that rely on trust and accurate data sharing. In aviation, many processes involve multiple parties (manufacturers, airlines, maintenance crews, regulators), and ensuring a single source of truth is challenging with traditional systems.
Blockchain can serve as that single source, enabling trustless collaboration where all parties see the same verified information. This technology has the potential to revolutionize various aviation domains, improving safety, efficiency, and even customer experience. Industry interest is on the rise – the global aviation blockchain market was estimated around $687 million in 2023 and is projected to grow nearly five-fold by the early 2030s.
Major stakeholders like airlines, aerospace OEMs, and regulators are piloting blockchain projects, signaling that this “hype” is becoming reality. In the sections that follow, we explore how blockchain is being applied in aviation supply chains, maintenance, passenger identity management, ticketing, smart contracts, and more, with examples of key projects and an eye on regulatory considerations. By 2025, blockchain is no longer just a buzzword in aviation – it’s increasingly viewed as a strategic tool for enhancing transparency and efficiency in a complex, global industry.
Blockchain In Supply Chain – Tracking Parts, Supplier Authentication, Reducing Fraud
Aviation supply chains are intricate, involving thousands of parts and numerous suppliers across the globe. Ensuring the authenticity and traceability of every aircraft part is critical for safety. Blockchain offers a tamper-proof way to track parts from manufacture through installation and beyond, creating an immutable log of each component’s journey.
This level of transparency can dramatically reduce fraud and counterfeit parts in the supply chain. A stark reminder came in 2023 with the AOG Technics scandal, where fake engine parts with forged certificates infiltrated the market. In the wake of such incidents, the industry is turning to blockchain-based traceability: with a blockchain system in place, it becomes “relatively easy to detect fake parts” and verify a part’s origin and maintenance historys.
Each part can be assigned a digital token or “passport” on the blockchain containing details like its manufacturing batch, repairs, and approvals. For example, Air France–KLM’s maintenance arm and Parker Aerospace recently rolled out a blockchain platform for “back-to-birth” tracking of aircraft parts, using the SkyThread for Parts data-sharing network.
This allows them to trace hundreds of thousands of Boeing 787 components on a shared ledger. As a Parker Aerospace executive noted, leveraging blockchain enables a comprehensive track-and-trace solution that ensures complete transparency and traceability of parts. Similarly, SITA (the air transport IT provider) in partnership with ILS (a major aviation parts marketplace) has introduced a “digital passport” system using blockchain to log each serialized part’s entire life cycle. This digital passport, implemented in ILS’s platform, safeguards asset value for buyers and sellers and speeds up parts transactions by providing verifiable provenance at the click of a button.
Early adopters report significant benefits: less paperwork, fewer manual errors, and faster verification. In fact, blockchain-based part tracking can cut out the usual lag in obtaining or confirming records. By having all partners (manufacturers, MROs, airlines) write transactions to a shared ledger, the time spent on reconciling part histories drops, and the risk of accepting unapproved parts diminishes. The technology also slashes counterfeit risk – any attempt to introduce a bogus part would be evident because it wouldn’t have a legitimate blockchain records.
Overall, for aviation supply chains, blockchain means total transparency for critical parts and a huge leap in trusts. It cuts costs by reducing fraud, streamlining audits, and even lowering insurance premiums (since parts’ authenticity can be proven instantly).
No wonder an industry coalition of major airlines and OEMs is now working on blockchain-informed best practices to strengthen supply chain integrity. The message is clear: when every part’s story is recorded on-chain from cradle to grave, we get a safer, more efficient supply chain with far fewer shadowy corners for fake or substandard parts to hide.
Aircraft Maintenance Records – Immutable Digital Logs and Lifecycle Tracking
Maintaining accurate aircraft maintenance logs is both mandatory and vital for safety and asset value. Traditionally, these records have been siloed in paper logbooks or disparate IT systems, making them prone to loss, error, or manipulation. Blockchain offers a solution by providing an immutable digital ledger for maintenance records.
Every inspection, part replacement, and service action can be timestamped and appended to the chain, creating a permanent history for each airframe and component. This immutability ensures that records cannot be tampered with – a selling point that has caught the interest of regulators like EASA and the FAA as they examine digital record-keeping innovations.
In fact, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency ran the VIRTUA project (completed in 2024) specifically to assess using blockchain for managing approved aircraft parts and airworthiness data. One key finding from VIRTUA was that blockchain enables enhanced traceability through “back-to-birth” tracking of aircraft parts, significantly reducing the risk of unapproved parts entering service.
Another finding: blockchain can improve data integrity by securely storing maintenance records and compliance documents on an immutable ledger, ensuring accuracy and transparency of safety-critical data across an aircraft’s life. In practice, this could mean the end of missing logbooks or incomplete histories – any authorized party (airline, lessor, regulator) could retrieve a trusted maintenance record instantly from the chain.
Companies like GE Aviation have already implemented such solutions. GE’s blockchain system creates a “back-to-birth” digital history for engine components, described as akin to “Ancestry.com for jet engines,” that travels with each part through its overhauls and transfers. This secure, digitized paper trail has real financial benefits: GE reported that by having verifiable maintenance and usage records for used parts, those parts’ residual values increased by up to 50%, and resale processes sped up dramatically.
Moreover, maintenance partners saw millions of dollars in previously stuck revenue freed up because discrepancies and disputes over records were eliminated. Another industry player, MTU Maintenance, noted that a blockchain-based records system helped release over $10 million in unsettled cash that was tied up in reconciliation processes – a direct boost to cash flow.
Beyond cost, there’s a clear safety and compliance upside: if every repair and inspection is logged immutably, airlines can prove adherence to maintenance schedules, and regulators can audit more easily. Lost or incomplete records, which can ground an aircraft or reduce its resale value, become a thing of the past. Blockchain records also mean if an airline or lessor sells an aircraft, the new owner gets a full, trustworthy maintenance history with the asset – enhancing its value and simplifying due diligence.
Startups like BlockAviation have even demonstrated how a blockchain could provide a unified, tamper-proof aircraft records database accessible to all stakeholders. Of course, moving to digital ledgers isn’t instantaneous. The FAA, for instance, has only begun approving purely electronic logbook systems (e.g. Vision Aircraft Records’ digital logbook was approved in late 2023).
But blockchain goes a step further by enabling decentralized trust. Industry alliances (like the MRO Blockchain Alliance launched by SITA and partners) are actively working on standards so that maintenance record blockchains can be widely accepted.
In the near future, we can expect that when an aircraft goes in for a maintenance check, each task completed – each part changed, each inspection – will be securely written to a blockchain, creating an incorruptible log that follows the aircraft.
This promises easier regulatory compliance (since authorities could accept blockchain logs as evidence of airworthiness), faster audits, and higher aircraft residual values due to greater records confidencecryptecon.org. Immutable maintenance records are poised to make aircraft upkeep more proactive and data-driven, especially as they converge with IoT sensors feeding operational data into these ledgers.
Passenger Identity And Biometrics – Blockchain For Secure, Decentralized ID Verification
From check-in to boarding, verifying passenger identities is fundamental to aviation security – but it’s also a source of friction (think of all those passport checks). Blockchain technology, combined with biometrics, offers a path to streamline identity verification while enhancing security and privacy. The idea is to give passengers a decentralized digital identity or “self-sovereign identity” that they control, which can be verified by airlines and border agencies without relying on one central database.
In essence, a traveler’s passport, visa, or biometrics could be cryptographically authenticated via blockchain, allowing instant verification of identity and travel credentials. One prominent example is Zamna (formerly VChain), a blockchain-based identity verification platform tested by airlines like Emirates and British Airways. Zamna uses blockchain to securely share and cross-verify passenger data (like passport details) between parties without multiple manual checks. Its goal is to “eliminate physical document checks at airports and automate the check-in process,” greatly improving the travel experience.
In such a system, a passenger would, say, enroll their passport and facial biometrics through an airline or government app, which then creates a verifiable digital credential stored on a blockchain. At the airport, facial recognition can confirm the traveler’s identity against that credential, without the passenger needing to show paper ID multiple times. Because the identity data is decentralized, no single entity holds all the personal data – instead, verification is achieved by the blockchain ledger confirming authenticity (for example, confirming that a government issued and still vouches for a passport).
This addresses privacy by design: the traveler shares only the minimum necessary data (and perhaps only a cryptographic proof of validity) rather than handing over full documents. Projects by SITA and others illustrate the potential. In 2021, SITA worked with the government of Aruba and technology partner Indicio to trial a Digital Travel Credential that let visitors use a digital passport on their phone, verified via blockchain, to clear immigration more seamlessly.
Early results showed that travelers could retain control of their personal info while airports could trust the authenticity of the credential. Biometrics (like facial scans) tie into this by binding the physical traveler to the digital identity. By 2025, the use of biometrics in air travel is surging – nearly 46% of passengers used biometrics at the airport in 2024, and over 70% want to use biometric ID instead of traditional passports when possible.
Blockchain can amplify the benefits of biometrics by providing a secure way to manage the “digital identities” behind those biometric scans. Instead of each airline or airport storing biometric identities in central silos (which raises privacy and hacking concerns), a blockchain-based identity network could allow interoperable yet privacy-preserving identity checks. Importantly, blockchain’s auditability means each identity verification event can be logged (without exposing personal data content), creating a traceable trail that security agencies might appreciate.
Some governments and airline groups (for example, the Known Traveler Digital Identity initiative and IATA’s One ID concept) are exploring distributed ledger approaches to identity. The end vision is a curb-to-gate experience where your face or fingerprint securely unlocks your verified identity on a blockchain, zipping you through checkpoints – while ensuring you alone consent to when and where your data is used.
Passengers would enjoy a smoother journey (no more juggling IDs and boarding passes), and airlines/airports get high assurance that each traveler is who they claim. Of course, implementing this at scale requires global standards and agreements on data sharing.
But we are already seeing steps: startup trials like Zamna’s, SITA’s Aruba pilot, and even blockchain-based health passes during COVID-19 (where multiple airlines trialed sharing COVID test/vaccine credentials on a ledger) have proven the concept.
Going forward, decentralized digital IDs could become an aviation norm – with blockchain as the backbone that keeps everyone honest and data secure. This would marry well with biometric systems being rolled out at airports (e.g. UAE airports’ biometric corridors, US TSA PreCheck’s digital ID trials, etc.), making the entire travel process both more seamless and more robust against identity fraud.
Ticketing And Payments – Crypto and Blockchain-based Loyalty Systems
Blockchain is also reshaping how airlines sell tickets and manage payments or loyalty programs. In ticketing, one compelling idea is the use of “smart tickets” or tokenized tickets. Instead of the traditional e-ticket record in a database, a ticket could be represented as a unique token on a blockchain. This opens up the possibility for more flexible and secure ticket distribution – for instance, enabling verified secondary markets for airline tickets (something that’s currently restricted or cumbersome).
A blockchain-based ticket could be easily transferred or resold with the airline’s oversight, because the ledger can record each ownership change while enforcing rules (e.g., no resale after a certain date) via smart contracts. It could also reduce fraud, since each ticket’s authenticity is verifiable on-chain and counterfeit e-tickets would be nearly impossible. Beyond tickets, cryptocurrency payments are making headway in aviation. Several airlines now accept Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies for flight purchases, often facilitated by payment processors.
In fact, the Universal Air Travel Plan (UATP – a payment network owned by airlines) signed a deal to allow its 260+ member airlines to accept Bitcoin as payment. This indicates a broad willingness in the industry to embrace crypto if it means more payment options for customers. Some carriers like AirBaltic, Vueling, and Emirates have announced crypto acceptance or plans for it, riding on the trend of digital currencies becoming more mainstream.
While crypto payments remain a tiny fraction of total sales, offering the option can be a tech-forward marketing point and attract a niche of crypto-savvy travelers. More transformative is how blockchain is reinventing loyalty programs. Frequent flyer programs generate huge customer engagement and liabilities on airline balance sheets, and blockchain can add flexibility and value to these systems.
By tokenizing loyalty points (miles), airlines can make points interchangeable across programs and partners, and even spendable like cash in a broader ecosystem. For example, Singapore Airlines innovated with “KrisPay”, a digital wallet for its KrisFlyer miles that uses blockchain to enable instant mile-to-money conversions for purchases. A KrisFlyer member can seamlessly spend miles at participating merchants as if they were currency, with the blockchain ensuring the transaction is secure and the ledger updating the balance in real-time. This turns otherwise siloed loyalty points into a liquid asset.
Other airlines have pursued similar blockchain-based loyalty moves: in 2023, Lufthansa launched an NFT-based loyalty program called Uptrip (built on the Polygon blockchain) in which flying on certain routes awards travelers digital collectible cards that can be traded and combined for rewards. It’s a novel, gamified approach blending Web3 with loyalty incentives.
Meanwhile, startups and fintechs are working on platforms to consolidate various travel loyalty currencies into one blockchain wallet, giving consumers greater flexibility (for instance, converting hotel points to airline miles through token swaps). The benefit for airlines of a blockchain loyalty system is reduced breakage and higher engagement – if points are more usable and transferable, customers derive more value (which can drive business) and unredeemed points liability goes down.
Additionally, blockchain’s transparency can build trust: customers can verify their point balances and transactions on a public or permissioned ledger, reducing discrepancies. On the operations side, smart contracts could automate the accrual and redemption of miles across partners. Consider an airline alliance or code-share flights: rather than batch reconciling miles earned on partner flights, a blockchain smart contract could automatically credit the appropriate account in real-time as soon as a flight is completed, based on shared ledger data.
This kind of efficiency is very appealing in complex alliances. Beyond loyalty, blockchain might also power new payment and settlement systems in the industry. IATA has explored distributed ledger technology for simplifying interline settlement between airlines. Traditionally, when airlines need to settle accounts (for things like baggage fees, code-share tickets, etc.), it’s a slow, periodic process.
A blockchain-based settlement network could enable real-time, multi-party settlements with less overhead and fewer disputes, since all parties share a synchronized record of transactions. Overall, blockchain and crypto are pushing aviation commerce toward more customer-centric and efficient models. Imagine an aviation ecosystem where you can purchase a ticket with crypto, have your loyalty points tokenized and freely traded, and even hold your “gold status” as an NFT in your wallet – proving your status across any airline.
While these are emerging concepts, 2025 has seen serious steps in this direction, indicating that airlines want to be ready for a more decentralized, digital economy of travel.
Smart Contracts – Automation in Leasing, Insurance, and Parts Procurement
Smart contracts are self-executing programs on a blockchain that run when certain conditions are met. In aviation, which involves numerous contracts and conditional processes, smart contracts promise to automate and streamline many transactions that currently require manual oversight. One area ripe for this is aircraft leasing. The leasing market is huge – nearly half of commercial aircraft worldwide are owned by lessors and leased to airlines – and managing those lease agreements is complex.
Each lease has conditions about maintenance, usage hours, return conditions, insurance, etc., typically monitored through regular reports and human audits. With smart contracts, much of this could be digitized. For example, a smart contract could be coded to pull data from an aircraft’s flight hours or engine cycles (via IoT sensors or usage reports on blockchain) and automatically execute certain terms: if the aircraft exceeds its contracted hourly usage in a month, the system could trigger an automatic additional payment from airline to lessor, or schedule a maintenance slot per the agreement.
Lease payments and billing could also be handled by a smart contract that releases funds periodically or upon milestones, reducing delays and disputes. As one analyst put it, “smart contracts, powered by blockchain, can automate lease agreements, ensuring transparency and reducing the workload of manual paperwork.” The result is a lease that essentially manages itself – both airline and lessor have near-real-time visibility into compliance, and costly intermediaries (or error-prone reconciliations) can be minimized.
Another domain is aviation insurance. Insurance policies for airlines (hull insurance, engine programs, flight delay insurance for passengers, etc.) are full of conditions that might be ideal for automation. A smart contract-based insurance policy could automatically verify if a flight was delayed or cancelled (by reading trusted data feeds) and trigger payouts to affected passengers without the need for claims processing. Or consider maintenance insurance programs: if a covered component fails, a blockchain could instantly share the event data with the insurer and the smart contract could initiate the claims process or dispatch a replacement part.
Some insurers have joined blockchain consortia (like the aviation arm of the B3i initiative) to explore such possibilities. Parts procurement and inventory management can also benefit. Imagine an airline’s inventory system is linked to a smart contract: when a certain part’s stock level on the blockchain ledger drops below threshold, the smart contract automatically issues a purchase order to the pre-approved supplier (perhaps even executing via a decentralized marketplace).
This isn’t far-fetched – as noted by a legal study, a program “which automatically pre-orders new parts when parts reach end-of-life” is a perfect use case of a smart contract in aviation supply chains. It removes the delay in human-triggered ordering and ensures no time is lost in maintaining stock of critical spares. Smart contracts can also enforce quality and custody tracking in the supply chain: e.g., a contract could require a digital sign-off (blockchain transaction) from a maintenance technician when installing a part, which then automatically notifies the original manufacturer, updating the part’s history and possibly triggering payment for usage or warranty validation.
Beyond these, consider fuel contracts and ground handling services – fueling an aircraft at an airport could be streamlined if the fuel provider’s system logs the fuel quantity on a blockchain which automatically calculates payment from airline to provider via a pre-agreed rate smart contract, cutting out invoice processing. Or landing and navigation fees that auto-calculate based on flight data and settle among stakeholders on-chain.
Essentially, any process with if-then logic between parties in aviation could see efficiency gains with smart contracts. The benefits include: elimination of middlemen costs, reduction of delays in contract execution, automatic enforcement of terms (no more chasing down adherence, as the code handles it), and improved trust (since all parties can see the contract’s outcome on the shared ledger).
However, to implement this, common standards and platforms need to be in place. There are early proof-of-concepts – for instance, blockchain-based cargo booking platforms like Freightchain use smart contracts to allow airlines and shippers to automatically match cargo to flights and issue air waybills. Another example: some car leasing pilots (analogous to aircraft leasing) have shown how assets can “self-manage” their leases via blockchain triggers.
In aviation, as data from aircraft and operations becomes more accessible (thanks to IoT, e-logs, etc.), expect smart contracts to progressively handle routine agreements. Of course, careful legal alignment is needed – these contracts must be recognized by law and align with regulations (for instance, automatically repossessing a plane via smart contract isn’t feasible without legal process!).
Nonetheless, the trajectory is toward more automation and less manual friction in aviation’s contractual web. In leasing, insurance, and procurement, smart contracts could free up human managers to focus on exceptions and strategy rather than paperwork, while providing all parties with timely, transparent enforcement of their agreements.
Key Projects
Blockchain’s promise in aviation is backed by real projects and pilots by major industry players. Here we highlight a few key initiatives that exemplify how the technology is being used:
- SITA’s FlightChain and MRO Blockchain Alliance —
SITA (the IT provider co-owned by airlines) has been a pioneer in aviation blockchain. Back in 2017, SITA’s
FlightChain project trialed sharing flight status data via blockchain, involving British Airways and major airports (Heathrow, Geneva, Miami). It demonstrated that a shared ledger could serve as a single source of truth for flight schedules and updates, resolving conflicts between airport and airline data.
Building on that success, SITA launched the Aviation Blockchain Sandbox to invite industry experimentation. A crucial finding was the value of smart contracts for data sharing – enabling parties to share info “without relinquishing control or compromising security,” which is exactly what aviation needs. More recently, in 2020, SITA and industry partners formed the MRO Blockchain Alliance, the first industry-wide group to investigate blockchain for maintenance and parts tracking.This consortium including airlines, OEMs, MRO providers, and logistics firms aimed to standardize how parts “digital passports” and repair records could be recorded on blockchain. By 2023, this evolved into concrete partnerships – for example, SITA joined with ILS (Inventory Locator Service) to integrate blockchain-based part traceability into ILS’s global parts marketplace.
John Herrman, EVP at ILS, noted that the aftermarket parts sector was inefficient and heavily paper-based, and that blockchain can “digitally track, trace, and record aircraft parts” across the many players involved. The SITA/ILS solution now offers buyers on ILS a trusted digital log of a part’s origin, condition, and ownership before purchase, adding confidence and speed to transactions. This case shows how a consortium approach can bring multiple stakeholders onto a single blockchain platform for mutual benefit.
- Honeywell GoDirect Trade —
Honeywell Aerospace made headlines by bringing the used aircraft parts market into the blockchain era. In late 2018 it launched
GoDirect Trade, an Amazon-style online marketplace for aviation parts that is underpinned by blockchain. Sellers on GoDirect Trade (including Honeywell’s own surplus parts division and third-parties) list used or new parts – anything from avionics to engine components.What differentiates the platform is that each part’s listing is accompanied by digitized quality documents and the
entire part history recorded on a blockchain ledger. For example, if you’re buying a used avionics box, you can see its serial number, how many hours/cycles it’s been through, any repairs done, which airlines/operators it served, etc., all verified on Honeywell’s blockchain.A customer browsing can essentially
“view the entire lifecycle of everything they buy,” from birth to current condition. Blockchain ensures these records are secure and can’t be falsified, which is crucial for establishing airworthiness of used parts. Within weeks of launch, GoDirect Trade had hundreds of buyers registered and was processing significant transactions, reflecting pent-up demand for a trusted digital marketplace.Honeywell later expanded the concept, introducing a service called
TrustTrace to give any part a blockchain-verifiable pedigree even outside the marketplace. This case study is important because it shows an aerospace OEM leveraging blockchain to create transparency in a traditionally opaque market (aftermarket parts) and to speed up trade. By 2021, billions of dollars in parts from Boeing and others were being tracked on the platform’s blockchain. The ROI for Honeywell and participants comes from reduced escrow and inspection costs, quicker sales, and greater confidence that translates into higher value for surplus parts.
- GE Aviation’s TRUEngine Blockchain —
GE Aviation (now GE Aerospace) implemented a blockchain solution as part of its TRUEngine program (which certifies engines and parts that have GE-approved maintenance). GE’s blockchain creates a
digital thread for each engine part, logging every maintenance event, repair, and transfer. They’ve likened it to an ancestry record for jet engines. GE worked with Microsoft and others on this system and even teamed up with TE-FOOD (a supply chain traceability firm) to extend it.The results reported by GE are striking: by having a clear chain of verified data, used engine parts gained more value (up to 50% higher resale value, as noted)
, and what used to take days of paperwork to audit could be done in seconds. GE also applied blockchain to some COVID-era challenges, launching a solution to track health screening and aircraft cabin cleaning records on-chain – an example of using the tech for safety protocol compliance.GE’s project is a case study in achieving both
financial and safety benefits: airlines and lessors can trust the provenance of parts (improving residual values and reducing spare inventory needs), and the immutable records ensure only properly maintained parts are in use (enhancing safety). GE’s success has spurred others: after seeing GE, other engine OEMs and large MROs have begun exploring similar blockchain records to manage components throughout their life cycle.
- Risk Mitigation (Value Preservation) —
Not losing records or data has a big ROI when it comes to asset value. If an airline loses an aircraft’s maintenance history, the aircraft’s value can drop dramatically or it might not be sellable. Blockchain essentially
bullet-proofs data against loss, thus preserving asset value. The Swiss Aviation Blockchain study pointed out that keeping aircraft records safe and tamper-proof is essential to avoid seeing fleet value “rapidly diminish,” and blockchain provides that safety net. Also, by ensuring only approved parts are used, blockchain reduces the risk of incidents that lead to expensive unplanned maintenance or lawsuits. Airbus and others —
Airbus has been involved in blockchain pilots such as partnering in the aforementioned industry coalition on supply chain integrityaviationweek.com. Airbus and others like Boeing and Safran joined forces in 2023 to form the Aviation Supply Chain Integrity Coalition, which, while not solely about blockchain, clearly sees digital traceability as a key tool.On the airline side,
Etihad Airways recently dabbled in blockchain by launching a cryptocurrency-based rewards token and even an NFT collection (the EY-ZERO1 NFTs) that ties into their frequent flyer program. This is more of a marketing-oriented case, but it indicates airlines’ willingness to experiment with Web3 technologies to engage customers.
Lufthansa’s Uptrip we discussed earlier is another notable case of a major airline group adopting blockchain (Polygon network) to modernize loyalty. In cargo, Singapore Airlines Cargo was involved in a trial using blockchain for air freight booking and documentation, and Korean Air tested blockchain for interline cargo tracking – showing that even the less glamorous side of aviation (logistics) can benefit from the tech’s efficiency and trust.Even airport operators have looked into blockchain:
Heathrow Airport participated in FlightChain, and others have considered blockchain for secure sharing of security data and operational logs among airport stakeholders. Lastly, a unique case is ANSPs (air navigation service providers) using blockchain for air traffic management data – for example, NASA and FAA researched the use of blockchain to securely share drone traffic management data.Each of these projects and case studies adds a piece to the puzzle, demonstrating that blockchain can work in the real aviation world and deliver value. They also provide lessons learned on governance (forming consortia, defining data standards) and technology (choosing permissioned vs. public ledgers, scaling the solution) that will inform future implementations.
As more of these initiatives move from pilot to production, the network effect will kick in – more airlines, OEMs, and airports will join networks because the value of interconnection grows. Today’s case studies could well become tomorrow’s industry-standard platforms.
- Risk Mitigation (Value Preservation) —
Regulatory And Security Landscape – GDPR, Data Ownership, and Compliance
As blockchain adoption grows, regulatory and security considerations have come to the forefront in aviation. The industry is heavily regulated for safety and also deals with sensitive data (both personal data of passengers and proprietary data of companies). This raises important questions: How can blockchain systems comply with privacy laws like GDPR? Will aviation authorities recognize and approve blockchain records? Who “owns” data on a decentralized ledger? And how to ensure blockchain itself is secure from cyber threats?
Data privacy (GDPR): In jurisdictions like the EU, stringent laws (GDPR) govern personal data use. A naive blockchain implementation that puts passenger personal information or employee records on an immutable ledger could conflict with rights like the “right to be forgotten,” since blockchain data is notoriously hard to erase. Regulators are aware of this.
The European Data Protection Board in 2025 issued guidelines clarifying that storing personal data on a blockchain should generally be avoided if it conflicts with data protection principles. Instead, designs should use techniques like hashing or off-chain storage for personal data, ensuring that any on-chain data is either non-identifying or consented to. For example, a passenger’s digital ID on blockchain might actually just be a reference or a verified credential hash, while the actual personal details remain in a secure database that can be deleted or amended in compliance with GDPR.
Organizations are advised to conduct Data Protection Impact Assessments before deploying blockchain solutions involving personal data. Privacy-by-design measures – like encrypting data before writing to the ledger, or using permissioned blockchains with access controls – can reconcile blockchain with privacy requirements. In short, balancing transparency with privacy is crucial. Aviation companies will need to ensure that only necessary, non-sensitive information is on-chain (e.g., a part ID and its certification status), while sensitive data (like a passenger’s biometric template) might be kept off-chain but referenced securely.
Regulatory acceptance and compliance: Aviation is one of the most regulated industries, and any new technology must meet stringent safety and security standards. Blockchain solutions must undergo rigorous vetting to ensure they don’t introduce risks (for instance, a bug in a smart contract cannot be allowed to disrupt maintenance tracking). Agencies like FAA and EASA will likely require demonstration that blockchain systems are robust, have backup and restore capabilities, and do not undermine existing oversight processes.
So far, regulators have been cautiously optimistic: EASA’s VIRTUA project suggests a proactive approach to understand the tech. But formal acceptance will take time – for example, when will a blockchain maintenance log be considered an acceptable alternative to traditional records? Possibly not until standards are in place and perhaps an ICAO or IATA-backed framework exists. Regulatory lag is a challenge; technology often moves faster than rules.
However, regulators also see the benefits: better traceability, faster access to records, and reduction in fraud all support safety oversight. We might soon see guidance material or advisory circulars from authorities on using blockchain for record-keeping in aviation. Until then, organizations deploying these solutions often run them in parallel with traditional systems to satisfy current rules. On the aviation security side, regulators will also scrutinize blockchain for any vulnerability.
A nightmare scenario to avoid is a critical aviation blockchain being attacked or corrupted, potentially impairing operations (imagine if an aircraft can’t get cleared for flight because a maintenance blockchain node is down). Fortunately, permissioned blockchain networks can be built with redundancy and known node operators, mitigating many security concerns of public blockchains.
Data ownership and governance: A unique issue with decentralized ledgers is who owns or controls the data. In a multi-party aviation blockchain (say, an airline-OEM-MRO network), governance is key. Stakeholders need agreements on who can validate transactions, who can view what data, and how to resolve disputes or errors. Unlike a single database where one entity is accountable, a consortium blockchain spreads responsibility.
Clear rules must define roles (who is the data “controller” for GDPR, for instance, if multiple entities write passenger data on a chain?). The Aviation Maintenance blockchain consortia have tackled this by forming governance boards and using legal contracts alongside the technology to allocate responsibilities. Likewise, intellectual property and confidentiality need protection – airlines might be wary of sharing maintenance data if competitors could glean operational insights. Permissioned blockchains with tiered access can address this (only authorized parties see the full details, others see anonymized or no data). As these networks mature, governance frameworks will likely standardize, possibly under neutral bodies like IATA.
Security of blockchain systems: While blockchain itself is very secure (thanks to cryptography and consensus mechanisms), the overall system is only as secure as its weakest link. User endpoints, smart contract code, and integration with legacy systems could be targets for cyber attacks. A hacker can’t easily alter a validated blockchain record, but they might steal private keys to simulate an authorized user and inject false data.
Therefore, robust cybersecurity practices (key management, identity and access management, regular audits of smart contracts) are required. Fortunately, aviation is used to high security standards, so extending those to blockchain implementations is feasible. Also, by removing single points of failure, blockchain can enhance security: for example, instead of all maintenance records sitting on one server that could crash or be compromised, they are distributed across many nodes, increasing resilience.
Still, concerns remain: one is scalability and performance. Aviation operations generate enormous data; can blockchain handle it without slowing down transactions? Early implementations focus on critical data only and use efficient consensus to ensure performance. SITA’s FlightChain, for instance, tested both Hyperledger and Ethereum and noted the importance of scalability for industry use. Ongoing advances (like more efficient blockchain protocols or layer-2 networks) are making it more viable.
In summary, the regulatory and security landscape is a mix of challenges and active progress. Industry and regulators are working hand-in-hand – with groups like EASA’s working group and IATA task forces – to ensure blockchain solutions enhance safety and comply with laws. We’re seeing guidance emerge on issues like data privacy in blockchain. The aviation sector, given its cautious nature, will likely implement blockchain in a permissioned, well-governed manner, with security and compliance built in from day one. Those who navigate these complexities successfully will set the standards for everyone else.
Benefits And ROI – Cost Reduction, Audit Readiness, and Real-time Visibility
Why are aviation companies investing in blockchain? The benefits and return on investment (ROI), while varying by use case, are increasingly tangible:
- Cost Reduction & Efficiency Gains —
Blockchain can eliminate or streamline many manual processes. By creating a single source of truth, it reduces the need for duplicate record-keeping and reconciliation between parties. For example, in aircraft leasing or parts sales, the time engineers and administrators spend cross-checking paper records or chasing documentation can be drastically cut. GE Aviation estimated that its blockchain-based system could save the industry billions of dollars in maintenance costs annually by improving parts tracking and preventing costly errors or overstock.
Similarly, a PwC analysis cited in one study projected a 5% reduction in MRO costs industry-wide (around $3.5 billion) if blockchain were adopted for maintenance record management. These savings come from avoiding unnecessary maintenance (due to better history tracking), reducing aircraft downtime, and optimizing inventory. Automation via smart contracts further cuts costs by handling transactions (like settlements, mile transfers, insurance claims) without human intervention or intermediary fees.
- Fraud Reduction & Improved Trust —
One of the hardest benefits to quantify but crucial in aviation is the reduction of fraud and increase in trust. With blockchain’s transparency, issues like counterfeit parts and falsified logs can be dramatically reduced. When an airline or MRO knows that a part’s certificate on the blockchain is authentic, they avoid the huge potential costs of installing fake or substandard parts (which can lead to in-flight failures or expensive investigations).
The AOG Technics scandal mentioned earlier is an example where the cost to airlines (inspecting and replacing suspect parts across fleets) was enormous – blockchain traceability could prevent such scenarios. Trust also enables new efficiencies: for instance, lessors trusting an airline’s on-chain maintenance records might streamline redelivery processes (which today often involve expensive inspections and value adjustments for missing records).
In financial terms, aircraft with complete blockchain-backed records may retain higher value – indeed, as noted, GE found used engine material could fetch up to 50% more when its provenance and service life were clearly documented. That is a direct ROI for asset owners.
- Audit Readiness & Compliance Savings —
Aviation is subject to frequent audits – internal, regulatory, and third-party (like lessor audits of airlines). With an immutable ledger, preparing for audits becomes simpler. Data is readily available, timestamped, and historically complete. Audit trails are essentially built into the system. This can reduce the manpower and time needed for compliance.
Airlines have to demonstrate compliance with maintenance programs, safety directives, etc.; a blockchain system can produce evidence in moments, and regulators can even be given read-access to relevant parts of the ledger for continuous oversight. All of this translates to savings on legal fees, fewer penalties (since discrepancies are less likely), and less revenue lost waiting for paperwork clearance.
- Real-Time Visibility and Decision Making: Having real-time, trustworthy data enables faster and better decisions, which has financial benefits. For example, knowing the exact status and location of every part in the supply chain (with blockchain providing a live ledger of parts in transit, in store, installed, etc.) means airlines can avoid over-ordering spares “just in case.” It improves inventory turnover and reduces carrying costs.
A live view of maintenance records on blockchain helps planners optimize maintenance schedules, potentially avoiding last-minute aircraft groundings due to incomplete data. In operations, real-time shared data (like FlightChain for flight data or a baggage tracking ledger) can cut down delays and miscommunication – indirectly saving costs by improving on-time performance and customer satisfaction.
- Revenue Opportunities & New Services —
Blockchain can open up new revenue streams or business models. For instance, airlines could monetize unused loyalty points by tokenizing and selling them in an open market (with appropriate controls). Or data from a maintenance blockchain could be aggregated (with permission) and sold to analytics firms or used to provide value-added services (imagine an app that verifies an aircraft’s full history for prospective buyers – a “Carfax for planes” powered by blockchain).
Some early movers can also differentiate themselves: being able to say to customers “our aircraft have fully traceable parts and maintenance via blockchain” could be a marketing point that wins business from more safety-conscious clients (like lessors or charter customers).
- Risk Mitigation (Value Preservation) —
Not losing records or data has a big ROI when it comes to asset value. If an airline loses an aircraft’s maintenance history, the aircraft’s value can drop dramatically or it might not be sellable. Blockchain essentially bullet-proofs data against loss, thus preserving asset value. The Swiss Aviation Blockchain study pointed out that keeping aircraft records safe and tamper-proof is essential to avoid seeing fleet value “rapidly diminish,” and blockchain provides that safety net. Also, by ensuring only approved parts are used, blockchain reduces the risk of incidents that lead to expensive unplanned maintenance or lawsuits.To illustrate ROI with a concrete figure: after implementing blockchain for parts tracking, KLM’s maintenance division predicted a significant drop in “quarantined” parts (parts taken out of service due to missing documentation). Each quarantined part can mean tens of thousands of dollars tied up. With blockchain giving access to the part’s history, KLM anticipated streamlined maintenance and uninterrupted operations, which in one case was projected to save over $1 million in a year in avoided delays and spares logisticsaviationweek.com.
In loyalty, by increasing redemption and reducing breakage through tokenization, airlines might see higher active engagement and repeat sales – even a few percentage points increase in loyalty effectiveness can mean millions in revenue.
It’s worth noting that implementing blockchain isn’t free – there are upfront costs for IT development, integration, and change management. But many see it as a long-term investment that pays for itself. As more processes migrate to the blockchain platform, the incremental cost of each additional use case drops. For example, once an airline has a blockchain network in place for maintenance, extending it to handle leasing contracts or crew identity verification might be relatively low cost, yielding new savings on the same infrastructure.
In summary, the ROI case for blockchain in aviation is multifaceted: direct cost cuts, indirect operational savings, better asset values, and even revenue uplift from improved trust and new services. Early adopters like GE, Honeywell, and others have reported compelling metrics, encouraging the rest of the industry to not fall behind. Over time, as these systems scale, we will likely see industry-wide efficiency ratios improve – a necessary relief in an industry often squeezing for single-digit percentage improvements.
Challenges – Interoperability, Legacy Integration, and Regulatory Lag
While the potential of blockchain in aviation is exciting, it’s not all smooth flying. The industry faces a number of challenges and barriers to full-scale adoption:
- Interoperability and Standards —
Aviation is global, involving many different companies and systems. For blockchain to truly deliver, disparate systems need to talk to each other or use common standards. Right now, multiple blockchain platforms are being tested – one airline might use Hyperledger Fabric, another might be on Ethereum-based Quorum, etc. If these systems don’t interoperate, the benefits stay siloed. There’s a risk of fragmented adoption, where you have islands of blockchain that don’t connect.
Establishing industry standards (perhaps through IATA or other bodies) is essential so that, say, a part tracked on Airbus’s blockchain can be recognized on Boeing’s system when that part changes hands. Without standards, lack of interoperability could nullify the efficiencies blockchain seeks to create. Encouragingly, groups like the MRO Alliance are working on common data models for parts, and the VIRTUA project explicitly looked at different blockchain types to inform standards. But it will take time for the industry to coalesce around unified approaches.
Legacy System Integration —
Airlines and aerospace companies have heavy IT legacies – maintenance software, ERP systems, booking systems – some dating back decades. Integrating blockchain with these legacy systems is a technical and financial challenge. Rip-and-replace is not an option for mission-critical systems that keep planes flying. So blockchain solutions must be layered on top or alongside, with connectors to pull data from old databases onto the ledger and vice versa.Developing these integrations can be complex. For instance, hooking up a legacy maintenance tracking system to automatically write an entry to the blockchain when a mechanic signs off a task might require custom middleware. Additionally, legacy data may be incomplete or poor quality, which needs cleaning before entering an immutable ledger. The cost of integration and ensuring no disruption to ongoing operations is a big consideration slowing projects.
Companies have to carefully plan migrations – perhaps starting with parallel runs (maintaining both old and new) until trust in the blockchain system builds. This cautious approach is wise but does slow down adoption. Moreover, many legacy systems are not designed to share data easily, reflecting an older mindset of siloed operations; changing that paradigm requires overcoming internal resistance too.
- Scalability and Performance —
Aviation operations generate huge volumes of transactions (think of an international airline: thousands of flights, millions of passenger records, parts movements, etc.). Blockchain networks, especially those with complex consensus, might struggle with that scale if not designed properly.Scalability is a primary concern – the industry needs solutions that handle high throughput without latency that disrupts operations. Early blockchain pilots in aviation have been on a relatively small scale (a few nodes, limited data fields).
Scaling up to an entire airline alliance or a global parts pool is uncharted territory. Technologies are improving – newer blockchains claim higher TPS (transactions per second) – but careful testing is needed to ensure, for instance, that writing thousands of maintenance updates per hour won’t slow the network. There’s also the issue of data storage: blockchains aren’t efficient for large files. So big documents (like detailed maintenance manuals or sensor datasets) are usually kept off-chain with only hashes on-chain, adding complexity. In short, ensuring blockchain systems can efficiently handle the “enormous volume of daily transactions” in aviation is still a work in progress.
- Cultural and Organizational Resistance —
Aviation has a longstanding culture of safety and reliability, which can make it conservative in adopting new tech. There’s understandable resistance to change – “if it ain’t broke, why fix it?” Many decision-makers need to be convinced that blockchain isn’t just a buzzword. They recall past tech fads and may be wary. The wait-and-see approach is prevalent, with some airlines and lessors preferring competitors to test the waters first. Additionally, implementing blockchain might require new roles or re-skilling staff (e.g., learning to use digital wallets for records).
There can be pushback from employees comfortable with current processes. Overcoming this requires strong change management: education on the benefits, small pilot successes to show proof of concept, and involving end-users in design so the tools actually make their jobs easier. Champions and leadership buy-in are crucial to drive the paradigm shift where needed.
- Regulatory and Legal Uncertainty —
We touched on regulatory lag – it remains a barrier. Until regulators explicitly endorse blockchain-based records or processes, some companies will hesitate to rely on them solely. Questions like “will the CAA accept our blockchain log in lieu of paper?” or “how do we get approval for a blockchain-based passenger ID system under current laws?” create uncertainty.Legal issues such as liability also arise: if a smart contract fails and causes a financial loss or safety issue, who is liable – the software provider, or all members of the network? The law hasn’t fully caught up to smart contracts and distributed systems.
Contractual frameworks between blockchain consortia members must address liability, dispute resolution, data ownership, etc., which can be complex negotiations. There’s also jurisdictional complexity: aviation blockchain networks might be global – whose law applies if there’s a dispute or regulatory question? Until clear legal frameworks exist, many will proceed cautiously or limit blockchain use to non-critical areas.
- Data Security and Privacy Challenges —
|
While blockchain can improve security, it also introduces aparadox of transparency vs privacy. By design, blockchain shares data widely (at least to all permissioned members). Ensuring that sensitive data isn’t over-shared is challenging. Companies worry about competitive data being visible to others. For example, a maintenance blockchain might inadvertently reveal operational patterns of an airline (like how often they change a certain part) which competitors could exploit.
Permissioned chains with access controls are the answer, but setting those up adds complexity. Cybersecurity is another angle – blockchain tech is new to many aviation IT departments, so expertise is still being built on secure key management, etc.
A breach of a private key could be damaging (e.g., an attacker might insert false records). Thus, robust security protocols around blockchain usage must be developed, and new failure modes considered (like what if a blockchain node fails or goes out of sync? how to recover without data loss?). Redundancy and fail-safes need to be part of the architecture so that the loss of a few nodes or a cyber incident doesn’t halt operations.
Despite these challenges, the general sentiment is that they are surmountable with industry collaboration and time. Many in aviation believe that the hurdles must be overcome because the status quo (with its paper-heavy, siloed processes) is not sustainable in the long term, especially as the industry grows and pressures mount for efficiency.
As one commentary noted, addressing these challenges requires concerted effort and cooperation across the industry – but it’s essential for aviation’s future. Stakeholders are therefore coming together in working groups, sharing pilot results, and slowly building the trust needed to move forward.It’s also worth noting that not every process needs blockchain – part of the challenge is correctly identifying where it truly adds value and where more conventional tech might suffice. This evaluation is ongoing. In some cases, simpler solutions might work (a centralized database may solve a problem without the complexity of blockchain, if trust can be managed). Therefore, making the business case for each use is crucial to overcome skepticism; clear wins will pave the way for tackling the tougher integrations.
In summary, while blockchain is not a silver bullet, the aviation industry is methodically navigating its constraints. Interoperability can be achieved via standards bodies, legacy integration through middleware and phased adoption, regulatory acceptance through continued dialogue and demonstration projects, and privacy/security through careful network design and governance. The journey has its turbulence, but the destination – a more efficient, transparent system – is compelling enough that the industry is firmly on this path.
Future Outlook: Integration With Iot, AI, And Industry-wide Adoption
Looking ahead, the future of blockchain in aviation appears increasingly promising. As initial projects yield positive results and technology matures, broader adoption across various operational domains is expected. Here are a few key aspects of the future outlook:
- Deeper Integration with IoT (Internet of Things) —
The convergence of blockchain with IoT will be a game-changer for aviation. Modern aircraft and engines are equipped with hundreds of sensors generating real-time data on performance, wear, and environment. By 2030, it’s envisioned that many of these IoT data streams will feed directly into blockchain-based records. For instance, an engine could automatically log its cycle counts or vibration exceedances to a maintenance blockchain, triggering smart contract alerts for inspections if thresholds are crossed.
This creates a self-managing system where the physical asset “reports” itself to the ledger. IoT can also tag cargo containers or baggage with sensors that log handovers to a blockchain, providing an indelible chain of custody. Predictive maintenance stands to benefit hugely: AI algorithms could analyze the troves of secure sensor data stored on blockchain to predict failures before they happen, and then the blockchain could automatically notify the right maintenance teams and parts suppliers.
In fact, research has already indicated that combining blockchain’s trustworthy data repository with AI’s predictive power can transform maintenance efficiency. In the airport context, IoT devices tracking luggage or equipment could log events (like baggage loaded, fuel truck connected) to blockchains shared between airlines and airport authorities, improving coordination and reducing errors.
- Artificial Intelligence and Analytics on Blockchain Data —
As mentioned, AI will complement blockchain by mining the reliable data it provides. One can imagine AI-driven operational decision-making where an airline’s operations control center has dashboards fed by blockchain-verified data, enabling quicker rerouting of aircraft or crew because the data can be trusted. Machine learning models could be trained on the vast historical datasets of maintenance actions and part failures recorded on-chain to find patterns and optimize maintenance schedules further (e.g., identifying that certain parts from a batch tend to fail early under certain conditions and proactively replacing them).
Additionally, blockchain could facilitate sharing data with AI services without giving away raw data – through techniques like federated learning or secure multi-party computation, multiple airlines could collaboratively let AI analyze industry-wide data (like safety occurrences or fuel consumption trends) by using the blockchain as a common data layer, all while keeping each airline’s data compartmentalized. This could unlock cross-industry insights that were hard to get when data was siloed.
- Industry-Wide Consortia and Networks —
In the coming years, we’ll likely see the emergence of industry-wide blockchain networks in specific areas. Perhaps a global aircraft parts ledger becomes operational, where every major OEM and airline participates to register parts. If the Aviation MRO alliance succeeds, this could morph into a production system that any aviation player plugs into for part tracking – much like global distribution systems (GDS) exist for ticketing.
In passenger travel, one could foresee an IATA-backed identity blockchain that many airlines join to implement One ID globally. Several airlines and airports might trust a common network for sharing biometric validations and Known Traveler IDs, making international travel smoother. Similarly, alliances may create loyalty point exchange blockchains enabling seamless trade of miles between programs.
The formation of these networks will accelerate adoption: if, say, 80% of the world’s airlines use a certain blockchain for baggage or ticketing, the laggards will join simply to interline effectively. The network effect thus is key: with projects like VIRTUA paving enhanced safety protocols and GE demonstrating financial benefits, broader adoption is expected across operational domains.
- Regulatory Evolution —
By 2025 regulators are already engaged; by 2030 we can expect clearer frameworks. Future regulations may explicitly allow or even mandate blockchain for certain record-keeping. For example, once confident, an authority might say: “If maintenance records are on an approved blockchain network, physical logbooks are no longer required.” This would be a tipping point. Additionally, regulators might use blockchain themselves: envision EASA and FAA running nodes on industry blockchains for real-time oversight.
They could even issue airworthiness directives or safety notices through smart contracts that automatically notify all affected operators on the network. Standardization by bodies like ICAO could mean an aircraft registry on blockchain that is accepted worldwide for ownership and lien records, simplifying sales and financing. The legal system will also adapt to recognize smart contract-based transactions (e.g., aircraft lease settlements done via blockchain could be legally binding and enforceable across jurisdictions with proper treaties). In essence, the “lag” will turn into “lead” as authorities harness the tech for their own efficiency and update rules to support innovation.
- Challenges Resolved (or Mitigated) —
Many current challenges will be addressed over time. Scalability issues are likely to be solved by new blockchain protocols or off-chain scaling solutions (like sharding, roll-ups, etc., which are already being developed in the tech world). Interoperability might be achieved through blockchain of blockchains solutions or universal standards so data can move between networks. Organizations will also get more comfortable with the technology as best practices and success stories accumulate.
The workforce will include more blockchain-fluent professionals (perhaps tomorrow’s aircraft maintenance technicians will also be trained in managing digital records on blockchain platforms as part of their curriculum). Costs of implementation should come down as vendor solutions mature – what might have required a custom build in 2020 could be available as a turnkey cloud service by 2030.
- New Use Cases and Innovations —
As blockchain infrastructure becomes part of the fabric, new imaginative uses could emerge. Flight data recording is one potential area – black box data could be periodically hashed or even streamed securely to a blockchain, which could aid in accident investigations by providing an indestructible backup of key flight parameters. Slot management at airports (a notoriously tricky, trust-based allocation system) could use blockchain to transparently manage slot trading and usage rights.
Supply chain finance might develop where suppliers get paid via tokens the moment they deliver a part, using the blockchain’s verification as trigger (reducing working capital constraints). Even carbon offset tracking for flights could be done on blockchain, giving credibility to sustainability claims by recording emissions and offsets immutably. The synergy of blockchain with other trends like electric VTOL (air taxis) and drones could ensure these new vehicles have trusted identity and maintenance logs from day one.
For passenger experience, blockchain could enable a truly seamless journey: one day, a single secure blockchain-based “travel token” could encapsulate your passport, visa, health info, tickets, hotel reservations, all accessible only by you but verifiable by those who need to know. This might reduce today’s multiple apps and checks to one unified process.
Ultimately, the vision for the future is an aviation ecosystem that is far more efficient, transparent, and collaborative than today’s. Blockchain technology, by fostering trust and data integrity across organizational boundaries, is a vital tool to get there. As one 2024 analysis concluded, blockchain “stands poised to transform the aviation industry fundamentally” by enhancing safety, streamlining operations, improving customer experience, and reducing costs. It won’t happen overnight, but step by step we see the industry embracing the technology where it makes sense.
By 2030, blockchain could be as commonplace in aviation back-offices as the internet and databases are today – largely invisible to passengers, perhaps, but powering the processes that get them and their baggage safely and efficiently to their destination. The journey to that future is underway: with stakeholders collaborating to overcome barriers and harness this transformative technology, the aviation industry is gearing up for a new era of decentralized trust and efficiency.
The promise is a more resilient, transparent supply chain, safer and smarter maintenance, empowered passengers with control over their digital identities, and an overall ecosystem that can adapt and innovate faster. In the highly interconnected world of aviation, blockchain is set to be a high-flying enabler for decades to come.
